Is There Any Way Darwinism Can Be Refuted Fast Scientifically?

September 8, 2008

Is There Any Way Darwinism Can Be Refuted Fast Scientifically?

Darwinism can actually be scientifically refuted in SEVEN SECONDS FLAT or faster. I will time myself just before I finish writing this article and tell you how I did.

Three facts are key to this demonstration.

Fact No. One:

The Code Barrier, best referred to as the DNA Code Barrier, is a scientific principle that one kind of plant or animal only has the genetic information in its gene pool to produce its own kind. Take a cow as a simple example. While there may exist the genetic data to produce a wide variety of adaptations within the cow’s particular DNA, the simple fact is that cows only possess the genetic ability to produce other cows.

Plants and animals can only bring forth after their kind, just as we are told ten times in the Book of Genesis. This fact is known as the DNA Code Barrier and is a major problem for Darwinian-style evolution. The Darwinist must have a way for cows to produce non-cows, and this would only be feasible if there were a method for nature to add massive amounts of new and beneficial genetic information to an existing gene pool.

However, as of this writing, real science knows of no way for nature to add appreciable amounts of new and beneficial genetic data to one kind of a plant or animal’s DNA. The DNA Code Barrier is a huge roadblock for Darwinism.

Fact No. Two:

Gene Depletion is the scientific principle that all adaptations and/or mutations are the result of the sorting or the loss of the parents’ genetic information. In other words, adaptational variations, as well as mutational changes, are caused by the recombination or loss of the beginning genetic data which was inherited from the parents and not by the gain of new and beneficial genetic data. This means that mutations and adapted organisms are not genetically stronger as Neo-Darwinism falsely teaches.

Managing gene depletion is how ranchers breed cattle to best match their end-use goals. Breeders can get meatier cattle or better milk producers by breeding out traits that they do not wish their cows to have. This is done through the loss of genetic information, not by the gain of new data in the cow’s DNA. This is why the loss of genetic data is referred to as the scientific principle of Gene Depletion. Gene Depletion is yet another major roadblock for Darwinism, whose proponents keep insisting that humans and animals are evolving, contrary to a mountain of evidence that shows that humans and animals are devolving.

Fact No. Three:

Natural Selection is the scientifically-observed process whereby in free competition for resources the weaker of a species tends to be eliminated, unable to compete with the stronger of its kind. This means that the genetically weaker mutations and adaptations are the ones most likely removed from the population.

Now let’s put these three scientific principles together to reveal why no one has ever been able to discover any viable evidence of Darwinism having taken place.

Start your timer:

“The DNA Code Barrier plus Gene Depletion plus Natural Selection makes Darwinian-style change scientifically impossible.”

Stop your timer.

I got 6.4 seconds. That is how long it just took me to scientifically refute Darwinism, the foundation for Secular Humanism.

Russ Miller is author of The GENESIS Report Series. Register at http://www.new-earth-thought.com to receive FREE his 50 Facts vs. Darwinism e-mail series.

Tags : Darwinism, science, worldviews, old earth, young earth, biblical creation, fossil evidence